Crane Technical Paper 410 Free Download For Windows 10
Crane Technical Paper 410 Pdf Free Download
Relevance: Piping System Fundamentals View. CRANE Technical Paper 410 Metric (2009) View. CRANE Technical Paper 410 Metric (2009) $60.00. Crane Technical Paper 410-2009.pdf - Download as PDF File (.pdf) or read online. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. Search Search. Close suggestions. Crane Technical Paper 410. Kellogg System Eng. Design Manual. Crane Flow of Fluids. Crane Technical Paper 410 Free Download Pdf Ebook through valves, fittings and pipe - flow of fluids - home - crane flow of fluids - technical paper no. 410 iii in the 21st century, the global industrial base continues to expand. Fluid handling is still at the heart of new, more.
Cameron versus Crane Technical Paper #410
Cameron versus Crane Technical Paper #410
It seems to me that most of the loss information contained in Cameron Hydraulic Data manual is derived from Crane's Technical Paper #410: Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe. For example, the table on page 3-120 of Cameron uses the K-values from Technical Paper #410 with a friction factor assumed.
One issue of confusion, in Cameron (on page 3-118) they show the K-value for gradual enlargements as:
K = (1 - (D1^2/D2^2))^2
Technical Paper #410 uses the following formula (see page A-26, Formula 4):
K = (1 - (D1^2/D2^2))^2/(D1/D2)^4
The denominator in the Crane's formula makes the K-value almost an order of magnitude difference in some cases.
For example, for a sudden enlargement from a 16' pipe to 24' pipe, the K value according to Cameron is 0.3 while the K value according to Crane is 1.5.
Does anyone know which is correct or if both of them are correct? My opinion is that Crane is correct and Cameron is wrong (since Cameron borders on plagiarizing Crane), but you would think by 19th edition of Cameron, they would have this corrected. Any ideas?
Thanks,
M
One issue of confusion, in Cameron (on page 3-118) they show the K-value for gradual enlargements as:
K = (1 - (D1^2/D2^2))^2
Technical Paper #410 uses the following formula (see page A-26, Formula 4):
K = (1 - (D1^2/D2^2))^2/(D1/D2)^4
The denominator in the Crane's formula makes the K-value almost an order of magnitude difference in some cases.
For example, for a sudden enlargement from a 16' pipe to 24' pipe, the K value according to Cameron is 0.3 while the K value according to Crane is 1.5.
Does anyone know which is correct or if both of them are correct? My opinion is that Crane is correct and Cameron is wrong (since Cameron borders on plagiarizing Crane), but you would think by 19th edition of Cameron, they would have this corrected. Any ideas?
Thanks,
M